Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Horus on the Prairie's avatar

While I find the core values of Ma'at to be more or less commensurate within a classical liberal framework, I am always wary of trying to compare Pharaohs to Presidents. A feudal agrarian theocratic monarchy in the bronze and iron ages is so far removed economically and politically from a 21st century market oriented representative republic, that direct parallels become almost arbitrary. This is especially the case when evaluating current policies.

For example, while opponents of the current administration's policies see an unstable tyrant running roughshod over good governance forged by an educated and enlightened consensus in Washington DC, proponents support these changes precisely because they want to reduce and decentralize what they see as authoritarian overreach by the federal government. They too will point to wealthy boogeymen; only this time it's lobbyists, or heads of NGOs and corporations, who collaborate with the bureaucracy to mutually enrich each others' power and money.

Both seem to use the language of freedom versus authoritarianism in our American culture. Meanwhile, when I see lamentations and admonitions in Egyptian literature against their rulers and officials, they use their own cultural language of criticizing for dishonesty and corruption rather than the scope and size of government. I have seen complaints about taxes being too high as well in the ancient ritings; some things never change, but at least Pharaoh's supplicants, courtiers and hangers-on were more obvious in their flattery ;)

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts